Home
Membership
Bulletin
Publications
Conference
Call for Papers
Venue
>
Accommodation
Keynote Speakers
Conference Committees
>
Tribute to Prof. Battistelli
Prizes and Awards
>
Eusebio Rial-González Innovation & Practice Award
Andre Bussing Prize
Adalgisa Battistelli Award
Delegate Registration
Conference Dinner
Sponsors and supporting institutions
Provisional Programme
Education and Training
Practice Forum
Small Grant Fund
Forthcoming Events
Healthy Healthcare
Work and Stress
International
Organisational Structure
Contact Us
12th EAOHP Conference, Athens: Feedback
1. Pre-conference and registration
*
Indicates required field
a) Pre-conference information on the EAOHP website
*
Unacceptable
Poor
Adequate
Good
Excellent
b) The abstract submission process
*
Unacceptable
Poor
Adequate
Good
Excellent
c) The delegate registration process
*
Unnacceptable
Poor
Adequate
Good
Excellent
d) Quality of the recommended accomodation
*
Unacceptable
Poor
Adequate
Good
Excellent
e) Quality and Usefulness of delegate bag (Book of abstracts, EAOHP annual book etc.)
*
Unacceptable
Poor
Adequate
Good
Excellent
2. Conference Venue
a) Proximity of accommodation to venue
*
Unacceptable
Poor
Adequate
Good
Excellent
b) Adequacy of rooms for presentations/workshops
*
Unacceptable
Poor
Adequate
Good
Excellent
c) Audio/Visual support
*
Unacceptable
Poor
Adequate
Good
Excellent
d) Helpfulness of the reception desk
*
Unacceptable
Poor
Adequate
Good
Excellent
e) Helpfulness of conference stewards and organising team
*
Unacceptable
Poor
Adequate
Good
Excellent
f) Overall quality of conference venue
*
Unacceptable
Poor
Adequate
Good
Excellent
g) Accessibility of hosting city (e.g. flights etc.)
*
Unacceptable
Poor
Adequate
Good
Excellent
3. Scientific content of the conference
a) Range of topics covered and discussed
*
Unacceptable
Poor
Adequate
Good
Excellent
b) Quality of keynote presentations
*
Unacceptable
Poor
Average
Good
Excellent
c) Quality of oral presentations
*
Unacceptable
Poor
Adequate
Good
Excellent
d) Quality of poster presentations
*
Unacceptable
Poor
Adequate
Good
Excellent
e) Scheduling/timing of poster sessions
*
Unacceptable
Poor
Adequate
Good
Excellent
f) Scheduling/timing of oral sessions
*
Unacceptable
Poor
Adequate
Good
Excellent
g) Kindly suggest speakers who you would like to see deliver future keynote addresses
*
4. In which format would you like to recieve the book of abstract at the next conference?
*
Printed paper (book format)
Electronic - Online Document
Electronic - Memory stick
Both (book and online document)
5. Social content of conference
a) Quality of refreshment breaks
*
Unacceptable
Poor
Adequate
Good
Excellent
N/A
b) Quality of lunch
*
Unnaceptable
Poor
Adequate
Good
Excellent
N/A
c) Conference dinner
*
Unacceptable
Poor
Adequate
Good
Excellent
N/A
d) Opportunities for networking
*
Unacceptable
Poor
Adequate
Good
Excellent
6. What did you like the MOST about this conference?
*
7. What did you NOT like about this conference?
*
8. How could the conference best be improved?
*
Submit