Survey - The European Academy of Occupational Health

Home
Membership
Bulletin
Publications
Conference
Forthcoming Events
Education and Training
Practice Forum
Small Grant Fund
Work and Stress
International
Organisational Structure
Contact Us
Members' Area

12th EAOHP Conference, Athens: Feedback

1. Pre-conference and registration

* Indicates required field

a) Pre-conference information on the EAOHP website *

Unacceptable Poor Adequate Good Excellent

b) The abstract submission process *

Unacceptable Poor Adequate Good Excellent

c) The delegate registration process *

Unnacceptable Poor Adequate Good Excellent

d) Quality of the recommended accomodation *

Unacceptable Poor Adequate Good Excellent

e) Quality and Usefulness of delegate bag (Book of abstracts, EAOHP annual book etc.) *

Unacceptable Poor Adequate Good Excellent

2. Conference Venue

a) Proximity of accommodation to venue *

Unacceptable Poor Adequate Good Excellent

b) Adequacy of rooms for presentations/workshops *

Unacceptable Poor Adequate Good Excellent

c) Audio/Visual support *

Unacceptable Poor Adequate Good Excellent

d) Helpfulness of the reception desk *

Unacceptable Poor Adequate Good Excellent

e) Helpfulness of conference stewards and organising team *

Unacceptable Poor Adequate Good Excellent

f) Overall quality of conference venue *

Unacceptable Poor Adequate Good Excellent

g) Accessibility of hosting city (e.g. flights etc.) *

Unacceptable Poor Adequate Good Excellent

3. Scientific content of the conference

a) Range of topics covered and discussed *

Unacceptable Poor Adequate Good Excellent

b) Quality of keynote presentations *

Unacceptable Poor Average Good Excellent

c) Quality of oral presentations *

Unacceptable Poor Adequate Good Excellent

d) Quality of poster presentations *

Unacceptable Poor Adequate Good Excellent

e) Scheduling/timing of poster sessions *

Unacceptable Poor Adequate Good Excellent

f) Scheduling/timing of oral sessions *

Unacceptable Poor Adequate Good Excellent

g) Kindly suggest speakers who you would like to see deliver future keynote addresses *

4. In which format would you like to recieve the book of abstract at the next conference?

*

Printed paper (book format) Electronic - Online Document Electronic - Memory stick Both (book and online document)

5. Social content of conference

a) Quality of refreshment breaks *

Unacceptable Poor Adequate Good Excellent N/A

b) Quality of lunch *

Unnaceptable Poor Adequate Good Excellent N/A

c) Conference dinner *

Unacceptable Poor Adequate Good Excellent N/A

d) Opportunities for networking *

Unacceptable Poor Adequate Good Excellent

6. What did you like the MOST about this conference? *

7. What did you NOT like about this conference? *

8. How could the conference best be improved? *

Submit

✕